Hmm... Your experiment literally misses the entire point of using WebSockets over AJAX.
Let me know when your AJAX API is capable of handling a million concurrent connections while responding to 20,000 requests per second.
AJAX starts sucking when scaling becomes an issue; WebSockets beat AJAX at both small AND large scales, and something like socket.io (or a node.js server) is incredibly easy to set up... so why not do it?
Comment
Hmm...
Your experiment literally misses the entire point of using WebSockets over AJAX.
Let me know when your AJAX API is capable of handling a million concurrent connections while responding to 20,000 requests per second.
AJAX starts sucking when scaling becomes an issue; WebSockets beat AJAX at both small AND large scales, and something like socket.io (or a node.js server) is incredibly easy to set up... so why not do it?
Replies
Why not? Because 20,000 requests per second is extremely rare.